E’ di ieri l’indignazione dei cattolici contro la bestemmia pronunciata da Silvio Berlusconi nel raccontare una barzelletta.
Ma i cattolici hanno il diritto di indignarsi per chi impreca contro il loro dio criminale e assassino?
Per secoli i cristiani sono andati ad ingiuriare i cittadini affermando: “La malattia di tuo figlio te l’ha mandata dio per i tuoi peccati!”
Quando le persone rispondevano: “Porco il tuo dio!” subito mandavano poliziotti e magistrati a condannarli per bestemmia. Questo perché i cristiani hanno sempre imposto l’idea che le persone fossero oggetto di possesso del loro dio e che il loro dio poteva fare quello che voleva senza che i loro schiavi (leggi fedeli) potessero in qualche modo rivendicare una qualche forma di diritto nei confronti dell’onnipotenza e insindacabilità delle azioni che LORO attribuivano to their god.
Throughout history, Christians are the people who slaughter other people to submit to their god, but the instigator of these massacres is their god. The pig is not only the Christian who slaughters people, but it's pork, criminal and murderess, their god who orders to kill those who kneels before him. "Anyone who sacrifices to other gods, except the" ladies "only to be punished with death" Exodus 22, 19. And 'Jesus, the pig and the murderer, principal of the genocide when ordering ".. here you lead my enemies, those who did not want me dominion over them, and sgozzateli in my presence." Order of Jesus in Luke 19, 27.
The performer is a Catholic, but the customer is the god of the Christians and the Jesus of the Christians.
doctrinal absolutism of the god of Christians and their master Jesus has its legitimacy in the civil law that prevents human beings to claim their right to existence of the god of hatred against Christians and their master Jesus These laws punish with sanctions not in history, the "crime of blasphemy."
The crime of blasphemy was assumed that the individual has no right to claim against the god of the Christians and they could harass, to their whims, the individual with any crap and cowardly. The individual had no right to curse against him.
This relationship between the individual and the owner of the Christian god has been modified with the advent of the Constitution of the Italian Republic in which the god of the Christians owner loses all rights of legitimacy and is confined within the faith, religion, and away civil society. The believer has the right to believe that his master is his god, but can no longer claim that citizens are forced to believe that criminal, that swine, their god. Every time the Christian believer in the society tries to impose the principles of absolute monarchy of his god, is the pig to the Constitution of the Republic which would, in fact, actually subversive actions against the same.
The Constitution of the Republic amending national report that violence and god lord of the Catholic church required the people. In the current legal
the crime of blasphemy is adjusted so as to safeguard the religious sentiment of believers. The believer of any religion is protected by free offenses. The only "god" that does not have the right to protection from the "crime" of blasphemy is the god of the Christians call God, it becomes a generic name and not a proper name. A generic name that takes the form of its name only in context of believers, but not in the realm of society civil protection every DIVINITY ', of all religions, dall'insulto intended to denigrate the religion that which belongs to the believer.
Only the god of the Christians have all the responsibility upon himself the hatred that was expressed to the citizens by the advent of Christianity until the advent of the Constitution of the Republic: he is the pig, the criminal, the criminal incites to genocide and the slaughter of the people. And these signs are not the result of the fantasies of an anti-Christian, but are regularly described in the holy books of Christians and considered "immutable word of their god" written for the Holy Spirit. Slaughter men, women and children, are orders of Christian god which are frequently found in the Bible. E 'from the Bible's teaching that Hitler is producing his "final solution".
On any rule prevails to the Constitution of the Republic and also the god of the Christians owner must be submitted to the rules of the Constitution of the Republic and the provisions of the Criminal Code: it is not acceptable and, even today, the principal claims of massacres and killings and , as principal, to be above the law. How many times have we heard the phrase uttered by insulting Christians and Catholics in particular: "And 'the will of God!" Which means "submit yourself to the event and do not seek solutions."
La Corte Costituzionale ha già sentenziato sul “reato” di bestemmia che diventa un’ingiuria gratuita contro una divinità di qualunque religione che aggredisca il sentimento religioso, per il sentimento religioso, del singolo credente: uno stupro emotivo!
Lo stesso stupro emotivo che ha messo in atto con volontà di offesa a Venere il cattolico Umberto Eco durante la trasmissione televisiva “Che tempo che fa”.
Il problema della bestemmia sta nella relazione che c’è fra credente cattolico e la divinità dei cattolici. In realtà, solo il cristiano può bestemmiare il suo dio. Le altre religioni possono censurare il dio dei cristiani, attribuire degli appellativi solo formalmente infamanti, solo per censurare le azioni e gli ordini che il dio padrone impone ai suoi fedeli. Tali censure non toccano il sentimento religioso dei cristiani o dei cattolici, ma toccano la volontà ingannatrice dei cattolici che vorrebbero che il porco del loro dio non sia proprio un porco, come lo definisce il sistema giuridico attuale in relazione alle azioni del loro dio descritte nella bibbia, ma sia molto più simile all’UNO dei Neoplatonici con tutti gli attributi di bontà e di intelligenza propri del Neoplatonismo. In altre parole, i cristiani macellano per ordine del loro dio assassino, porco e criminale, ma pretendono che i loro macellati, le loro vittime, pensino al loro dio non come le loro sacre scritture lo descrivono, ma come i Neoplatonici, they were exterminated, described their god.
Why this mental translation?
Because in reality every single Christian God is identified psychologically with his master and gives substance to the claim of his god lord almighty and impunity for crimes. The Christian does not worship a god, but he is the God who imposes on others. This identification of Christ with his god, bring non-Christian to have his submission to God but to demand that others submit to his god because his god is none other than himself.
From this comes the psychological mechanism claim Silvio Berlusconi to curse his God. The same god who, shortly before the Parliament, ha promesso di stuprare i cittadini al fine di sottrarli dai loro diritti Costituzionali e sottometterli a lui (per questa violenza è stato lodato dai vescovi cattolici). Per questo il dio dei cristiani può essere indifferentemente deriso e ingiuriato da Berlusconi perché, in fondo, lui si ritiene quel dio. Ritenendosi quel dio padrone si ritiene anche in diritto di deriderlo e raccontarci delle barzellette mentre, altri cattolici, che a loro volta si identificano col loro dio padrone, ritengono che Silvio Berlusconi li abbia offesi bestemmiando il dio in cui loro si identificano.
Riporto l’articolo:
'Avvenire', bestemmia "insopportabile""Premier ha dovere di sobrietà e rispetto"
The director of the bishops' newspaper takes up the controversy over the video of the Prime Minister published by Repubblica and L'espresso. "There is a culture of the bar at all costs that has taken hold and our policy is bad." But Msgr. Rino Fisichella minimizes: "You always know how to contextualize things"
ROME - "All we need is blasphemy in the joke of the President. A video - punctual as a curse - there he served on the Internet, while a Another video has brought Silvio Berlusconi that playing with a worn stereotypes about Jews. " Thus begins the editorial director of the Future Mark Tarquinio, the day after the video posted by the website of L'espresso, in cui Berlusconi racconta una barzelletta contro Rosy Bindi che si conclude con una bestemmia.
"C'è una cultura della battuta a ogni costo che ha preso piede e fa brutta la nostra politica. E su questo tanti dovrebbero tornare a riflettere", esorta il quotidiano dei vescovi. "E farebbero bene a pensarci su davvero anche coloro che bestemmie di vario tipo e barzellette mediocri (tristemente dilaganti tra pseudo-satira e pseudo cultura) non le sopportano solo quando spuntano sulla bocca di un avversario, meglio se Silvio Berlusconi", scrive il direttore del quotidiano.
"Ma su ogni uomo delle Istituzioni, su ogni ministro e a maggior ragione sul capo del governo grava, inesorabile, un più alto dovere di sobrietà e di respect. For what it represents, and the feelings of the citizens - claims happened - one who is not named in vain. "Little is served an apology from the Prime Minister yesterday:" It's just a laugh. That we are talking about is a story circulated a year ago around the Parliament. Told her in private is neither an insult nor a sin. "Bad taste and the responsibility - said Berlusconi - is in case of those who advertise. I'm sorry if someone in his sensitivity he felt troubled. But I do not. It is only a pretext for attacks instrumental and hypocrites. "In short, the fault of the newspapers giornali.E respond. Famiglia Cristiana in the first place:" From the premier example of Christianity uses disposable. "We all know - Paolini writes the weekly - which is not the first and certainly not the last. Why Knight comes from one of the clearest examples of that 'Christianity à la carte' or 'Christianity disposable' which is today one of the deepest wounds of the social life of our country. "But today, Msgr. Rino Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the new evangelization, diminish the controversy over the joke with profanity, and does so on the sidelines of a confrontation between Church and politics with members Enrico Letta (Pd) and Maurizio Lupi (Pdl). "You always know at this time contextualize things, "he says." Certainly, we must first reduce our attention, quando siamo persone pubbliche, a non venir meno a quello che è il nostro linguaggio e la nostra condizione; dall'altra credo che in Italia dobbiamo essere capaci di non creare delle burrasche ogni giorno per strumentalizzare situazioni politiche che hanno già un loro valore piuttosto delicato", conclude Fisichella.
(02 ottobre 2010)
Tratto da:
http://www.repubblica.it/politica/2010/10/02/news/avvenire_premier-bestemmia-7639946/?ref=HRER1-1
Silvio Berlusconi ha bestemmiato il dio dei cristiani perché Silvio Berlusconi è un cattolico. Lo ha bestemmiato con l’aiuto e l’approvazione di Fisichella che quando dice “Bisogna always contextualize things, "says the pig of his god may be blasphemed by a Catholic as long as that is Catholic Silvio Berlusconi and Italian citizens face forgive raping and violating the Constitution for the greater glory of his god master. The double standards Fisichella's simple act of opportunism, as his defense of pedophile priests and responsibilities of the Catholic Church (and its Jesus) in inciting pederasty as a practical doctrine.
Fisichella tells us that his god is crap: should be contextualized. The contextualization is talking about Fisichella is the moral condemnation of his god. For a non-Christian, the God of Christians, is a criminal who should be condemned for his crimes, while Fisichella is aware that his god is a criminal, rather than prosecute him for murder, is willing to bear the curses of Silvio Berlusconi, however, she pays for violating the Constitution of the Republic according to moral principles the death of his god master.
October 2, 2010
Claudio Simeoni
Sorcerer's Apprentice Mechanic
Guardian Antichrist
P.le Parmesan, 8
30175 - Venezia Marghera
Tel 3277862784 e-mail claudiosimeoni@libero.it
Ma i cattolici hanno il diritto di indignarsi per chi impreca contro il loro dio criminale e assassino?
Per secoli i cristiani sono andati ad ingiuriare i cittadini affermando: “La malattia di tuo figlio te l’ha mandata dio per i tuoi peccati!”
Quando le persone rispondevano: “Porco il tuo dio!” subito mandavano poliziotti e magistrati a condannarli per bestemmia. Questo perché i cristiani hanno sempre imposto l’idea che le persone fossero oggetto di possesso del loro dio e che il loro dio poteva fare quello che voleva senza che i loro schiavi (leggi fedeli) potessero in qualche modo rivendicare una qualche forma di diritto nei confronti dell’onnipotenza e insindacabilità delle azioni che LORO attribuivano to their god.
Throughout history, Christians are the people who slaughter other people to submit to their god, but the instigator of these massacres is their god. The pig is not only the Christian who slaughters people, but it's pork, criminal and murderess, their god who orders to kill those who kneels before him. "Anyone who sacrifices to other gods, except the" ladies "only to be punished with death" Exodus 22, 19. And 'Jesus, the pig and the murderer, principal of the genocide when ordering ".. here you lead my enemies, those who did not want me dominion over them, and sgozzateli in my presence." Order of Jesus in Luke 19, 27.
The performer is a Catholic, but the customer is the god of the Christians and the Jesus of the Christians.
doctrinal absolutism of the god of Christians and their master Jesus has its legitimacy in the civil law that prevents human beings to claim their right to existence of the god of hatred against Christians and their master Jesus These laws punish with sanctions not in history, the "crime of blasphemy."
The crime of blasphemy was assumed that the individual has no right to claim against the god of the Christians and they could harass, to their whims, the individual with any crap and cowardly. The individual had no right to curse against him.
This relationship between the individual and the owner of the Christian god has been modified with the advent of the Constitution of the Italian Republic in which the god of the Christians owner loses all rights of legitimacy and is confined within the faith, religion, and away civil society. The believer has the right to believe that his master is his god, but can no longer claim that citizens are forced to believe that criminal, that swine, their god. Every time the Christian believer in the society tries to impose the principles of absolute monarchy of his god, is the pig to the Constitution of the Republic which would, in fact, actually subversive actions against the same.
The Constitution of the Republic amending national report that violence and god lord of the Catholic church required the people. In the current legal
the crime of blasphemy is adjusted so as to safeguard the religious sentiment of believers. The believer of any religion is protected by free offenses. The only "god" that does not have the right to protection from the "crime" of blasphemy is the god of the Christians call God, it becomes a generic name and not a proper name. A generic name that takes the form of its name only in context of believers, but not in the realm of society civil protection every DIVINITY ', of all religions, dall'insulto intended to denigrate the religion that which belongs to the believer.
Only the god of the Christians have all the responsibility upon himself the hatred that was expressed to the citizens by the advent of Christianity until the advent of the Constitution of the Republic: he is the pig, the criminal, the criminal incites to genocide and the slaughter of the people. And these signs are not the result of the fantasies of an anti-Christian, but are regularly described in the holy books of Christians and considered "immutable word of their god" written for the Holy Spirit. Slaughter men, women and children, are orders of Christian god which are frequently found in the Bible. E 'from the Bible's teaching that Hitler is producing his "final solution".
On any rule prevails to the Constitution of the Republic and also the god of the Christians owner must be submitted to the rules of the Constitution of the Republic and the provisions of the Criminal Code: it is not acceptable and, even today, the principal claims of massacres and killings and , as principal, to be above the law. How many times have we heard the phrase uttered by insulting Christians and Catholics in particular: "And 'the will of God!" Which means "submit yourself to the event and do not seek solutions."
La Corte Costituzionale ha già sentenziato sul “reato” di bestemmia che diventa un’ingiuria gratuita contro una divinità di qualunque religione che aggredisca il sentimento religioso, per il sentimento religioso, del singolo credente: uno stupro emotivo!
Lo stesso stupro emotivo che ha messo in atto con volontà di offesa a Venere il cattolico Umberto Eco durante la trasmissione televisiva “Che tempo che fa”.
Il problema della bestemmia sta nella relazione che c’è fra credente cattolico e la divinità dei cattolici. In realtà, solo il cristiano può bestemmiare il suo dio. Le altre religioni possono censurare il dio dei cristiani, attribuire degli appellativi solo formalmente infamanti, solo per censurare le azioni e gli ordini che il dio padrone impone ai suoi fedeli. Tali censure non toccano il sentimento religioso dei cristiani o dei cattolici, ma toccano la volontà ingannatrice dei cattolici che vorrebbero che il porco del loro dio non sia proprio un porco, come lo definisce il sistema giuridico attuale in relazione alle azioni del loro dio descritte nella bibbia, ma sia molto più simile all’UNO dei Neoplatonici con tutti gli attributi di bontà e di intelligenza propri del Neoplatonismo. In altre parole, i cristiani macellano per ordine del loro dio assassino, porco e criminale, ma pretendono che i loro macellati, le loro vittime, pensino al loro dio non come le loro sacre scritture lo descrivono, ma come i Neoplatonici, they were exterminated, described their god.
Why this mental translation?
Because in reality every single Christian God is identified psychologically with his master and gives substance to the claim of his god lord almighty and impunity for crimes. The Christian does not worship a god, but he is the God who imposes on others. This identification of Christ with his god, bring non-Christian to have his submission to God but to demand that others submit to his god because his god is none other than himself.
From this comes the psychological mechanism claim Silvio Berlusconi to curse his God. The same god who, shortly before the Parliament, ha promesso di stuprare i cittadini al fine di sottrarli dai loro diritti Costituzionali e sottometterli a lui (per questa violenza è stato lodato dai vescovi cattolici). Per questo il dio dei cristiani può essere indifferentemente deriso e ingiuriato da Berlusconi perché, in fondo, lui si ritiene quel dio. Ritenendosi quel dio padrone si ritiene anche in diritto di deriderlo e raccontarci delle barzellette mentre, altri cattolici, che a loro volta si identificano col loro dio padrone, ritengono che Silvio Berlusconi li abbia offesi bestemmiando il dio in cui loro si identificano.
Riporto l’articolo:
'Avvenire', bestemmia "insopportabile""Premier ha dovere di sobrietà e rispetto"
The director of the bishops' newspaper takes up the controversy over the video of the Prime Minister published by Repubblica and L'espresso. "There is a culture of the bar at all costs that has taken hold and our policy is bad." But Msgr. Rino Fisichella minimizes: "You always know how to contextualize things"
ROME - "All we need is blasphemy in the joke of the President. A video - punctual as a curse - there he served on the Internet, while a Another video has brought Silvio Berlusconi that playing with a worn stereotypes about Jews. " Thus begins the editorial director of the Future Mark Tarquinio, the day after the video posted by the website of L'espresso, in cui Berlusconi racconta una barzelletta contro Rosy Bindi che si conclude con una bestemmia.
"C'è una cultura della battuta a ogni costo che ha preso piede e fa brutta la nostra politica. E su questo tanti dovrebbero tornare a riflettere", esorta il quotidiano dei vescovi. "E farebbero bene a pensarci su davvero anche coloro che bestemmie di vario tipo e barzellette mediocri (tristemente dilaganti tra pseudo-satira e pseudo cultura) non le sopportano solo quando spuntano sulla bocca di un avversario, meglio se Silvio Berlusconi", scrive il direttore del quotidiano.
"Ma su ogni uomo delle Istituzioni, su ogni ministro e a maggior ragione sul capo del governo grava, inesorabile, un più alto dovere di sobrietà e di respect. For what it represents, and the feelings of the citizens - claims happened - one who is not named in vain. "Little is served an apology from the Prime Minister yesterday:" It's just a laugh. That we are talking about is a story circulated a year ago around the Parliament. Told her in private is neither an insult nor a sin. "Bad taste and the responsibility - said Berlusconi - is in case of those who advertise. I'm sorry if someone in his sensitivity he felt troubled. But I do not. It is only a pretext for attacks instrumental and hypocrites. "In short, the fault of the newspapers giornali.E respond. Famiglia Cristiana in the first place:" From the premier example of Christianity uses disposable. "We all know - Paolini writes the weekly - which is not the first and certainly not the last. Why Knight comes from one of the clearest examples of that 'Christianity à la carte' or 'Christianity disposable' which is today one of the deepest wounds of the social life of our country. "But today, Msgr. Rino Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the new evangelization, diminish the controversy over the joke with profanity, and does so on the sidelines of a confrontation between Church and politics with members Enrico Letta (Pd) and Maurizio Lupi (Pdl). "You always know at this time contextualize things, "he says." Certainly, we must first reduce our attention, quando siamo persone pubbliche, a non venir meno a quello che è il nostro linguaggio e la nostra condizione; dall'altra credo che in Italia dobbiamo essere capaci di non creare delle burrasche ogni giorno per strumentalizzare situazioni politiche che hanno già un loro valore piuttosto delicato", conclude Fisichella.
(02 ottobre 2010)
Tratto da:
http://www.repubblica.it/politica/2010/10/02/news/avvenire_premier-bestemmia-7639946/?ref=HRER1-1
Silvio Berlusconi ha bestemmiato il dio dei cristiani perché Silvio Berlusconi è un cattolico. Lo ha bestemmiato con l’aiuto e l’approvazione di Fisichella che quando dice “Bisogna always contextualize things, "says the pig of his god may be blasphemed by a Catholic as long as that is Catholic Silvio Berlusconi and Italian citizens face forgive raping and violating the Constitution for the greater glory of his god master. The double standards Fisichella's simple act of opportunism, as his defense of pedophile priests and responsibilities of the Catholic Church (and its Jesus) in inciting pederasty as a practical doctrine.
Fisichella tells us that his god is crap: should be contextualized. The contextualization is talking about Fisichella is the moral condemnation of his god. For a non-Christian, the God of Christians, is a criminal who should be condemned for his crimes, while Fisichella is aware that his god is a criminal, rather than prosecute him for murder, is willing to bear the curses of Silvio Berlusconi, however, she pays for violating the Constitution of the Republic according to moral principles the death of his god master.
October 2, 2010
Claudio Simeoni
Sorcerer's Apprentice Mechanic
Guardian Antichrist
P.le Parmesan, 8
30175 - Venezia Marghera
Tel 3277862784 e-mail claudiosimeoni@libero.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment